SHO Perturbations with Creation and Anihillation Operators



Hello,
In the last post I demonstrated how to compute a perturbation on the harmonic oscillator up to fourth order. In this post we'll do the same thing but using creation and annihilation operators. The eigenvalues obtained with this method are based on diagonalizing an n by n matrix where n is the number of solutions. Since there are an infinite number of solutions the eigenvalues will converge to the true values as the dimension of the matrix increases to infinity. Since we're not going to be diagonalizing the infinite matrix we can only obtain approximate solutions to the perturbed hamiltonian.
A really great resource for this and more examples/examinations of the method can be found here
The creation operator takes the form:

The annihilation operator is defined as:

We generated the above matrices with the following code:

We can then redefine the x operator in terms of our new operators, and use those to form a matrix that represents our perturbed hamiltonian (same perturbation as last time, x^4).

The hamiltonian matrix to dim 5 is:

We can then write a quick function to diagonalize a hamiltonian matrix of dim nmax and perturbation strength lambda.


Thanks,
Alex Krotz

Comments

  1. UnknownJanuary 13, 2020 at 11:38 PM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJanuary 18, 2020 at 3:17 PM

    People who write out their matricies are saints. But I guess mathmatic did it for you... You're not a real physicist until you do it on paper! :P

    Go for that frosh year krotz room covered in papers aesthetic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousJanuary 18, 2020 at 3:18 PM

      Oh also, is there any particular reason you needed to do this to 4th order?

      Delete
  3. Alex KrotzJanuary 18, 2020 at 5:21 PM

    No reason, fourth order was just a convenient stopping point.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownMarch 28, 2020 at 12:12 PM

      I was on gradcafe last night and there was this kid that really sounded like you and it led me to wondering, did you apply to any physics programs or even consider it? Atomic physics seems to be your thing.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Using Airplane Transponder Data to Characterize Antenna Performance

Image
Hi All, Recently I obtained some low-noise amplifiers in order to better receive NOAA GOES satellites. A low-noise amplifier however is no good without a decent antenna. Most often people use these 2.4 GHz wifi antennas modified to operate at the GOES downlink frequency. This typically gives very good results but it's pretty challenging to DIY a satellite dish. An alternative to satellite dish type antennas is the highly directional yagi-uda antenna. Yagi-uda antennas are pretty (seemingly) simple to build so one night I made a first pass at throwing one together. Alas the satellite signal still did not appear (probably due to my poor assembly). Instead of scrapping the inadequate antenna I decided to try and figure out if adding the passive elements actually did anything to the directionality of the yagi-uda antenna versus a regular dipole antenna. To do this without some sort of signal source is typically impossible and so people resort to modelling programs that calculate the ga
Read more

Microstate table for a d3 electronic configuration.

This was just a test to see if I could put LaTeX formatted tables into this webpage MathJax example $$\begin{array}{|c | c | c | c | c|} \hline \begin{array}{c}\end{array} & \frac{3}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} & -\frac{3}{2} \\ \hline 5 & \begin{array}{c}\end{array} & ^{2}H\begin{array}{c}^{2}H(2^+,2^-,1^+)\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}(1^-,2^-,2^+)\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}\end{array} \\ \hline 4 & \begin{array}{c}\end{array} & ^{2}G\begin{array}{c}^{2}H(2^+,2^-,0^+)\\^{2}G(2^+,1^+,1^-)\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}(0^-,2^-,2^+)\\(1^-,2^-,1^+)\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}\end{array} \\ \hline 3 & ^{4}F\begin{array}{c}^{4}F(2^+,1^+,0^+)\end{array} & ^{2}F\begin{array}{c}^{2}H(2^+,2^-,-1^+)\\^{2}G(2^+,1^+,0^-)\\^{4}F(2^+,1^-,0^+)\\^{2}F(2^-,1^+,0^+)\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}(1^-,2^-,0^+)\\(0^-,2^-,1^+)\\(0^-,1^-,2^+)\\(-1^-,2^-,2^+)\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}(0^-
Read more

Perturbation Theory in Mathematica

Hello, I've wanted to implement perturbation theory in mathematica for some time now. Here, I've done so for a non-degenerate time independent case. Specifically for the one dimensional harmonic oscillator (not quantum because symbolic constants just make the computation take longer). I tested it on some problems from Shankar's quantum mechanics book and it works. The things you'll need are: 1. Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions for a solved case (in our case the harmonic oscillator). $$H0=\frac{\text{$\#$1} x^2}{2}-\frac{\nabla _{\{x\}}^{}\text{$\#$1}}{2}\&$$ \[ScriptCapitalH]0 = -(1/2) Laplacian[#1,{x}] + 1/2 (x^2) #1 &; \[ScriptCapitalH]1 = x^2 #1 &; \[ScriptCapitalH] = \[ScriptCapitalH]0[#1] + \[ScriptCapitalH]1[#1] &; {eigList, wfnList} = DEigensystem[\[ScriptCapitalH]0[u[x]],u[x],{x}\[Element] FullRegion[1], nmax, Method -> "Normalize"]; where nmax is the maximum number of eigenvalues/eigenfunctions to compute.
Read more