Thermal Characteristics of an aluminum Heat Sink

Now that pretty much all my friends have left to their respective universities, I've had a lot of time to do the very boring yet nonetheless interesting experiments I've not yet had the time to do.

One of these is calculating the emissivity of an aluminum heat sink I have on an amplifier. The heat sink dissipates the heat from two large bipolar junction transistors that are used as the second stage of a two stage class A stereo amplifier.

The amplifier is only about 20% efficient, consuming about 50 watts and sending a max of only 5 watts to each of the speakers. As a result, the transistors get quite hot.

The heat sink is a square piece of aluminum measuring 12.7 cm x 12.7 cm x .635 cm.

Over the course of 1 hour I tracked the temperature given by a digital temperature probe every 30 seconds. The probe was resting between the heat sink and the side of the amplifier. Although this disrupts the ability of the heat sink to dissipate heat ideally, it allows for relatively smooth temperature changes to take place.

As an additional test, I also took the temperature every 30 seconds for an hour as the amplifier heated up from room temperature. The results are illustrated in the graph below.




After plugging in the Stefan-Boltzmann relationship I calculated an emissivity equal to .884. I understand that black body radiators have emissivity equal to 1 so this reduced efficiency of radiation is likely due to the shape of the heat sink and the placement of it right next to the wall of the amplifier. 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Using Airplane Transponder Data to Characterize Antenna Performance

Image
Hi All, Recently I obtained some low-noise amplifiers in order to better receive NOAA GOES satellites. A low-noise amplifier however is no good without a decent antenna. Most often people use these 2.4 GHz wifi antennas modified to operate at the GOES downlink frequency. This typically gives very good results but it's pretty challenging to DIY a satellite dish. An alternative to satellite dish type antennas is the highly directional yagi-uda antenna. Yagi-uda antennas are pretty (seemingly) simple to build so one night I made a first pass at throwing one together. Alas the satellite signal still did not appear (probably due to my poor assembly). Instead of scrapping the inadequate antenna I decided to try and figure out if adding the passive elements actually did anything to the directionality of the yagi-uda antenna versus a regular dipole antenna. To do this without some sort of signal source is typically impossible and so people resort to modelling programs that calculate the ga
Read more

Microstate table for a d3 electronic configuration.

This was just a test to see if I could put LaTeX formatted tables into this webpage MathJax example $$\begin{array}{|c | c | c | c | c|} \hline \begin{array}{c}\end{array} & \frac{3}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} & -\frac{3}{2} \\ \hline 5 & \begin{array}{c}\end{array} & ^{2}H\begin{array}{c}^{2}H(2^+,2^-,1^+)\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}(1^-,2^-,2^+)\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}\end{array} \\ \hline 4 & \begin{array}{c}\end{array} & ^{2}G\begin{array}{c}^{2}H(2^+,2^-,0^+)\\^{2}G(2^+,1^+,1^-)\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}(0^-,2^-,2^+)\\(1^-,2^-,1^+)\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}\end{array} \\ \hline 3 & ^{4}F\begin{array}{c}^{4}F(2^+,1^+,0^+)\end{array} & ^{2}F\begin{array}{c}^{2}H(2^+,2^-,-1^+)\\^{2}G(2^+,1^+,0^-)\\^{4}F(2^+,1^-,0^+)\\^{2}F(2^-,1^+,0^+)\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}(1^-,2^-,0^+)\\(0^-,2^-,1^+)\\(0^-,1^-,2^+)\\(-1^-,2^-,2^+)\end{array} & \begin{array}{c}(0^-
Read more

Perturbation Theory in Mathematica

Hello, I've wanted to implement perturbation theory in mathematica for some time now. Here, I've done so for a non-degenerate time independent case. Specifically for the one dimensional harmonic oscillator (not quantum because symbolic constants just make the computation take longer). I tested it on some problems from Shankar's quantum mechanics book and it works. The things you'll need are: 1. Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions for a solved case (in our case the harmonic oscillator). $$H0=\frac{\text{$\#$1} x^2}{2}-\frac{\nabla _{\{x\}}^{}\text{$\#$1}}{2}\&$$ \[ScriptCapitalH]0 = -(1/2) Laplacian[#1,{x}] + 1/2 (x^2) #1 &; \[ScriptCapitalH]1 = x^2 #1 &; \[ScriptCapitalH] = \[ScriptCapitalH]0[#1] + \[ScriptCapitalH]1[#1] &; {eigList, wfnList} = DEigensystem[\[ScriptCapitalH]0[u[x]],u[x],{x}\[Element] FullRegion[1], nmax, Method -> "Normalize"]; where nmax is the maximum number of eigenvalues/eigenfunctions to compute.
Read more